AquariumHQ
Search
Poor match3 concerns

Amano shrimp and Gold nugget pleco

Can these two share a tank? The assessment below is derived from stored behavioural and environmental traits, not from a compatibility chart.

VerdictPoor matchmoderate confidence

Workable only in unusual circumstances. Not a pairing to plan around.

Minimum volume
540 L
Minimum length
180 cm
Factors considered
7

Concerns

majortemperature

The shared band 26–27 °C sits at the top of one animal's range and the bottom of the other's. Both would be kept at their limits to accommodate the other. Both animals would be kept at the edge of their ranges to accommodate the other. Nothing here is a recommendation; it is the arithmetic of two incompatible requirements meeting at a point.

Derived from: environment.temperature range position on both records

minorterritory

Gold nugget pleco defends a territory and both animals use the same part of the tank, so give the territory-holder a defensible area away from the main swimming space.

Derived from: traits.territoriality and zone on both records

minorzone competition

Both species occupy the bottom of the tank, so allow for the shared space when judging the footprint.

Derived from: zone and traits.activity on both records

Why it can work

  • pH requirements overlap at 6.5–7.5.
  • Hardness requirements overlap at 4–12 °dGH.
  • Amano shrimp needs a group of at least 5. Kept in smaller numbers it is not simply lonely — shoaling species held below their threshold show chronic stress behaviour, colour loss and, in several species, increased aggression towards tankmates.
  • Gold nugget pleco is active mainly after dark, so the two overlap less than the stocking list suggests. Feed the nocturnal animal after lights-out or it will be outcompeted.

Conditions

Most interesting pairings are conditional on something. These are the things the keeper can actually change.

  • At least 5 Amano shrimp, counted as one group
  • At least 540 L with a footprint of 180 cm or more, before counting anything else in the tank

Derived, or documented?

These are different claims and are shown separately. The verdict above is derived from stored traits — arithmetic on AquariumHQ's own records. Whether the pairing is actually reported to work is a separate question, and for most pairs the honest answer is that we hold nothing.

Environmental compatibility

Derived from stored traits

Temperature, pH, hardness, size and behavioural traits compared between the two records. Sound as far as it goes, and it is not evidence that the pairing works.

Behavioural evidence

No behavioural evidence held

AquariumHQ holds no behavioural evidence for this pairing. The verdict is derived entirely from stored traits — it is arithmetic on our own records, not a report about how the pairing actually goes.

AquariumHQ's overall position

Generally workable in a tank with enough grazeable rock for both, and this record is inference from stored traits rather than a report about how the pairing goes — AquariumHQ holds no behavioural evidence for it in either direction. The environmental match is genuinely good, which is unusual for a pleco pairing and is the reason the entry exists at all.

Factor by factor

  • Competition for grazing surfaceDerived

    Both work biofilm from hard surfaces in strong flow. The pleco is territorial about the rock it grazes and is considerably larger, so the shrimp lose the better stations rather than being eaten.

  • PredationDerived

    The pleco takes invertebrates as part of its biofilm diet and a moulting shrimp is vulnerable. AquariumHQ holds no reports either way, so this is inference from the stored diet rather than an observation.

  • Flow and oxygenDerived

    The pleco needs strong flow and very high oxygen, which suits Amano shrimp better than it suits most dwarf shrimp. Environmentally this pairing is unusually well matched.

What the answer depends on. A single cell in a compatibility chart cannot hold any of these.
Depends onHow much
Tank size and dimensionssignificant
Life stageminor
The individual animalsignificant

How good is the overlap?

Whether two ranges intersect is a necessary condition, not evidence. What matters is WHERE the shared band sits: an overlap at the top of one animal's range and the bottom of the other's is a forced compromise however wide it looks, and it is the case a simple intersection test cannot see.

Each dimension assessed for the quality of the overlap, not merely its existence.
DimensionAssessmentWhat that means here
TemperatureForced compromise — neither animal is where it wants to beThe shared band 26–27 °C sits at the top of one animal's range and the bottom of the other's. Both would be kept at their limits to accommodate the other.
pHComfortable for bothThe shared band 6.5–7.5 pH sits centrally in both ranges, with room to drift.
HardnessWorkableThe shared band 4–12 °dGH is usable, though it does not sit centrally for both animals.

Forced compromise — neither animal is where it wants to be

Both animals would be kept at the edge of their ranges to accommodate the other. Nothing here is a recommendation; it is the arithmetic of two incompatible requirements meeting at a point.

Factor by factor

Every factor states what it rests on. Most are derived from the traits stored on both records — sound arithmetic on AquariumHQ's own data, and not a report about how the pairing actually goes. Where a factor says 'not known', the data is missing and saying so matters, because a missing factor and a favourable one look identical once both are absent.

2 evidence-backed17 derived0 not known
FactorBasisFinding
TemperatureDerived from stored traitsForced compromise — neither animal is where it wants to be. The shared band 26–27 °C sits at the top of one animal's range and the bottom of the other's. Both would be kept at their limits to accommodate the other.
pHDerived from stored traitsComfortable for both. The shared band 6.5–7.5 pH sits centrally in both ranges, with room to drift.
HardnessDerived from stored traitsWorkable. The shared band 4–12 °dGH is usable, though it does not sit centrally for both animals.
Body sizeDerived from stored traitsGold nugget pleco reaches about 30 cm against 5 cm for Amano shrimp — a ratio of 6.0. Size disparity drives opportunistic predation independently of temperament.
PredationDerived from stored traitsHighest predation risk in either direction is "none".
TerritorialityDerived from stored traitsStrongest territoriality across the pair is "strong".
Breeding aggressionDerived from stored traitsNeither becomes notably more aggressive while spawning.
Fin-nippingDerived from stored traitsNo nipper-and-target combination between these two.
AggressionDerived from stored traitsStrongest intraspecific aggression across the pair is "strong". It bears on the pairing because a fish under pressure from its own kind redirects.
Social requirementsDerived from stored traitsAmano shrimp needs at least 5. A shoaling species held below its threshold shows chronic stress and, in several species, increased aggression towards tankmates.
Group-size dependencyDerived from stored traitsThe outcome depends on group size as much as on the pairing: under-grouped shoalers nip more and hide more.
Tank zoneDerived from stored traitsBoth occupy the bottom of the tank, so the shared space is under pressure.
Activity levelDerived from stored traitsActivity levels are compatible.
Food competitionDerived from stored traitsDifferent feeding strategies, so direct competition is limited.
Risk to shrimp and snailsDerived from stored traitsHighest risk either animal poses to dwarf shrimp or snails is "low".
Effect on plantsDerived from stored traitsNeither animal damages planting.
Tank dimensionsDerived from stored traitsThe more demanding of the two needs at least 400 L and 150 cm of length before anything else is in the tank. Volume alone does not describe a home for a fish that swims in straight lines.
Life stageEvidence-backedLife-stage dependency: minor. See the documented record.
Individual variationEvidence-backedIndividual variation: significant.

Environmental overlap

ParameterShared rangeReading
Temperature26–27 °CAim for the middle of the shared band.
pH6.5–7.5Stability matters more than the exact figure.
Hardness4–12 °dGHCheck your source water before committing.

What this assessment cannot tell you

  • Individual temperament varies, particularly in cichlids and in bettas, and can override a favourable verdict for Amano shrimp or Gold nugget pleco.
  • The assessment is for the pair in isolation. A third species can change the outcome in either direction.
  • Both animals are assessed at adult size, not at the size they are sold.
  • A verdict is a statement about probability, not a guarantee.

Where the two water bands meet

Derived from the ranges AquariumHQ publishes for each species. The compatibility engine reads the same numbers; this is what they look like drawn on one axis.

Temperature (°C)

Amano shrimp
18–27
Gold nugget pleco
26–30
Both1.0 °C wide
26–27

Scale: 0 to 36 °C.

pH (pH)

Amano shrimp
6.5–8
Gold nugget pleco
6–7.5
Both1.0 pH wide
6.5–7.5

Scale: 4 to 9.5 pH.

Hardness (°dGH)

Amano shrimp
4–18
Gold nugget pleco
2–12
Both8.0 °dGH wide
4–12

Scale: 0 to 30 °dGH.

Where the two published bands coincide. The shaded row is the window in which both animals are inside the range AquariumHQ advises for them — which is narrower than either band and is the figure a keeper actually has to hit. Source: AquariumHQ husbandry positions for both records — editorial ranges, not measurements

Why the bands sit where they do

The overlap above is arithmetic. This is where the two numbers came from — the kind of water each animal is recorded from, and how much room that leaves.

These two animals come from different kinds of water, and that is where the arithmetic below comes from rather than from anything about their temperaments.

Amano shrimp

Subtropical stream

100–500 µS/cm · moderate flow · near saturation oxygen

Gold nugget pleco

Clearwater lowland river

Rio Xingu rapids

20–100 µS/cm · moderate flow · near saturation oxygen

  • TemperatureAmano shrimp 18–27°CGold nugget pleco 26–30°C

    Both inside their range from 26–27°C — 25% of the narrower animal’s range.

    Barely an overlap. Whatever is chosen, at least one animal spends its life at the limit of its published range — which is survivable and is not the same as suitable.

  • pHAmano shrimp 6.5–8Gold nugget pleco 6–7.5

    Both inside their range from 6.5–7.5 — 67% of the narrower animal’s range.

    A wide window. Both animals are inside their own range across most of it, and the tank can be run without either sitting at an edge.

  • General hardnessAmano shrimp 4–18 dGHGold nugget pleco 2–12 dGH

    Both inside their range from 4–12 dGH — 80% of the narrower animal’s range.

    A wide window. Both animals are inside their own range across most of it, and the tank can be run without either sitting at an edge.

Computed from the ranges AquariumHQ publishes for each species, each of which records what it rests on — a source value, a habitat inference, a physiological requirement or a trade convention. Most are habitat inferences, and the species pages say which.

The two species