Coverage
AquariumHQ measures itself against the questions people actually have, not against the number of pages it has generated. This page shows both — including everything the opportunity engine refused to build.
We do not have search volume data, and we do not invent it
AquariumHQ has no keyword-volume source. Rather than fabricate numbers, every candidate records what we honestly know: a structural proxy (an organism traded under several names is widely distributed commercially), an inference from how the domain is discussed, or nothing at all. No estimated volume is stored anywhere, and an audit fails the build if one ever appears.
The numbers
- Raw candidates generated
- 60,464
- After deduplication
- 60,248
- Accepted as worthwhile
- 11,879
- Rejected
- 48,369
- Covered
- 11,600
- Coverage
- 97.7%
- Accepted but not yet answerable
- 279
What was rejected, and why
A technically possible page is not automatically a worthwhile one. These are the candidates the gate refused.
| Reason | Count | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| combinatorial noise | 46,080 | Generated by combination rather than by anybody actually asking it |
| conflicts with welfare standard | 918 | The framing conflicts with the AquariumHQ welfare standard |
| no plausible demand | 612 | No plausible discovery or product utility |
| no unique information | 412 | Nothing substantial to say beyond restating a single stored field |
| not a distinct intent | 306 | Not a distinct intent — the same question in different words |
| duplicates another opportunity | 41 | Substantially duplicated by an accepted opportunity |
How accepted opportunities are delivered
An opportunity is a question somebody has. A page is a place the answer lives. Separating them is what stops the registry becoming a page-generation instruction — 'how big does a neon tetra get' is a real question and a terrible page.
| Delivery | Count |
|---|---|
| dedicated page | 2,741 |
| section of page | 8,849 |
| tool | 10 |
| not covered | 279 |
By family
| Family | Accepted | Covered | Rejected |
|---|---|---|---|
| organism facet | 7,330 | 7,070 | 1,846 |
| organism compatibility | 2,139 | 2,139 | 44,526 |
| plant facet | 800 | 800 | 24 |
| organism problem | 372 | 371 | 0 |
| organism core | 306 | 306 | 0 |
| problem phrasing | 301 | 301 | 2 |
| water facet | 187 | 175 | 1 |
| equipment facet | 128 | 128 | 4 |
| plant core | 78 | 78 | 0 |
| organism compatibility directory | 66 | 66 | 240 |
| husbandry core | 38 | 38 | 0 |
| problem core | 28 | 28 | 0 |
| comparison | 26 | 26 | 0 |
| water core | 25 | 25 | 0 |
| equipment core | 22 | 22 | 0 |
| tool | 16 | 10 | 0 |
| fish type index | 13 | 13 | 0 |
| distribution | 4 | 4 | 166 |
| combination generated | 0 | 0 | 1,560 |
Known gaps
Questions AquariumHQ judges worthwhile and cannot yet answer. They are listed rather than quietly dropped, because a coverage figure that only counts what we already have measures nothing.
| Gap | Count | Why it is not covered |
|---|---|---|
| insufficient data | 279 | The structured data needed to answer it does not exist in the catalogue yet. |
The largest gap is health conditions
The condition entity model exists and is unpopulated. Whitespot, velvet, fin rot, columnaris, dropsy and internal parasites are all high-demand, high-harm subjects, and publishing them without proper sourcing would be the most damaging thing this product could do. They are the first priority for the next sprint.
What exists today
| Record type | Count |
|---|---|
| organisms | 306 |
| fish | 235 |
| invertebrates | 71 |
| plants | 78 |
| water concepts | 25 |
| husbandry concepts | 10 |
| equipment concepts | 22 |
| problems | 28 |
| conditions | 38 |
| comparisons | 26 |
| sources | 35 |
| aliases | 2201 |