Goldfish and Scissortail rasbora
Can these two share a tank? The assessment below is derived from stored behavioural and environmental traits, not from a compatibility chart.
Should not be attempted. At least one factor is expected to cause harm.
- Minimum volume
- 460 L
- Minimum length
- 165 cm
- Factors considered
- 6
Concerns
The shared band 22–22 °C sits at the top of one animal's range and the bottom of the other's. Both would be kept at their limits to accommodate the other. Both animals would be kept at the edge of their ranges to accommodate the other. Nothing here is a recommendation; it is the arithmetic of two incompatible requirements meeting at a point.
Derived from: environment.temperature range position on both records
Goldfish reaches about 35 cm and takes fish small enough to swallow. At roughly 12 cm, an adult Scissortail rasbora is inside that range. This is usually discovered as fish quietly disappearing overnight rather than as visible aggression. Scissortail rasbora is fusiform — the ordinary torpedo and Goldfish has a small terminal mouth, so Scissortail rasbora stops being a possible mouthful SOONER than the usual rule suggests — at around 28% of Goldfish's length rather than 40%. The warning stands on what this predator is recorded as doing rather than on the geometry, because a fish that is awkward to swallow whole can still be attacked.
Derived from: traits.predation.smallFish, adultSize on both records, and the stored body form and gape of both
pH ranges overlap only across 7–7.5, which is tighter than most tap-water supplies hold naturally.
Derived from: environment.ph overlap width
Why it can work
- Hardness requirements overlap at 8–15 °dGH.
- Scissortail rasbora needs a group of at least 6. Kept in smaller numbers it is not simply lonely — shoaling species held below their threshold show chronic stress behaviour, colour loss and, in several species, increased aggression towards tankmates.
- The two occupy different levels of the tank, which reduces direct competition for space.
Conditions
Most interesting pairings are conditional on something. These are the things the keeper can actually change.
- At least 6 Scissortail rasbora, counted as one group
Derived, or documented?
These are different claims and are shown separately. The verdict above is derived from stored traits — arithmetic on AquariumHQ's own records. Whether the pairing is actually reported to work is a separate question, and for most pairs the honest answer is that we hold nothing.
Environmental compatibility
Derived from stored traits
Temperature, pH, hardness, size and behavioural traits compared between the two records. Sound as far as it goes, and it is not evidence that the pairing works.
Behavioural evidence
No behavioural evidence held
AquariumHQ holds no behavioural evidence for this pairing. The verdict is derived entirely from stored traits — it is arithmetic on our own records, not a report about how the pairing actually goes.
How good is the overlap?
Whether two ranges intersect is a necessary condition, not evidence. What matters is WHERE the shared band sits: an overlap at the top of one animal's range and the bottom of the other's is a forced compromise however wide it looks, and it is the case a simple intersection test cannot see.
| Dimension | Assessment | What that means here |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | Forced compromise — neither animal is where it wants to be | The shared band 22–22 °C sits at the top of one animal's range and the bottom of the other's. Both would be kept at their limits to accommodate the other. |
| pH | Forced compromise — neither animal is where it wants to be | The shared band 7–7.5 pH sits at the bottom of one animal's range and the top of the other's. Both would be kept at their limits to accommodate the other. |
| Hardness | Workable | The shared band 8–15 °dGH is usable, though it does not sit centrally for both animals. |
Forced compromise — neither animal is where it wants to be
Both animals would be kept at the edge of their ranges to accommodate the other. Nothing here is a recommendation; it is the arithmetic of two incompatible requirements meeting at a point.
Factor by factor
Every factor states what it rests on. Most are derived from the traits stored on both records — sound arithmetic on AquariumHQ's own data, and not a report about how the pairing actually goes. Where a factor says 'not known', the data is missing and saying so matters, because a missing factor and a favourable one look identical once both are absent.
| Factor | Basis | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | Derived from stored traits | Forced compromise — neither animal is where it wants to be. The shared band 22–22 °C sits at the top of one animal's range and the bottom of the other's. Both would be kept at their limits to accommodate the other. |
| pH | Derived from stored traits | Forced compromise — neither animal is where it wants to be. The shared band 7–7.5 pH sits at the bottom of one animal's range and the top of the other's. Both would be kept at their limits to accommodate the other. |
| Hardness | Derived from stored traits | Workable. The shared band 8–15 °dGH is usable, though it does not sit centrally for both animals. |
| Body size | Derived from stored traits | Goldfish reaches about 35 cm against 12 cm for Scissortail rasbora — a ratio of 2.9. Size disparity drives opportunistic predation independently of temperament. |
| Predation | Derived from stored traits | Highest predation risk in either direction is "moderate". |
| Territoriality | Derived from stored traits | Neither animal holds a territory. |
| Breeding aggression | Derived from stored traits | Neither becomes notably more aggressive while spawning. |
| Fin-nipping | Derived from stored traits | No nipper-and-target combination between these two. |
| Aggression | Derived from stored traits | Strongest intraspecific aggression across the pair is "none". It bears on the pairing because a fish under pressure from its own kind redirects. |
| Social requirements | Derived from stored traits | Scissortail rasbora needs at least 6. A shoaling species held below its threshold shows chronic stress and, in several species, increased aggression towards tankmates. |
| Group-size dependency | Derived from stored traits | The outcome depends on group size as much as on the pairing: under-grouped shoalers nip more and hide more. |
| Tank zone | Derived from stored traits | The two use different levels of the tank, which reduces direct competition for space. |
| Activity level | Derived from stored traits | Activity levels are compatible. |
| Food competition | Derived from stored traits | Both are omnivores. |
| Risk to shrimp and snails | Derived from stored traits | Highest risk either animal poses to dwarf shrimp or snails is "near-certain". |
| Effect on plants | Derived from stored traits | Goldfish eats plants, which constrains the aquascape rather than the pairing. |
| Tank dimensions | Derived from stored traits | The more demanding of the two needs at least 400 L and 150 cm of length before anything else is in the tank. Volume alone does not describe a home for a fish that swims in straight lines. |
| Life stage | Not known | AquariumHQ holds no record of whether this pairing changes as either animal matures. Stored traits describe adults, so a pairing that fails at adult size looks identical to one that never fails. |
| Individual variation | Not known | AquariumHQ holds no record of how much this pairing varies between individuals. For several species — bettas and cichlids especially — that variation decides the outcome and a species-level verdict cannot express it. |
Environmental overlap
| Parameter | Shared range | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 22–22 °C | Aim for the middle of the shared band. |
| pH | 7–7.5 | Stability matters more than the exact figure. |
| Hardness | 8–15 °dGH | Check your source water before committing. |
What this assessment cannot tell you
- Individual temperament varies, particularly in cichlids and in bettas, and can override a favourable verdict for Goldfish or Scissortail rasbora.
- The assessment is for the pair in isolation. A third species can change the outcome in either direction.
- Both animals are assessed at adult size, not at the size they are sold.
- A verdict is a statement about probability, not a guarantee.
Where the two water bands meet
Derived from the ranges AquariumHQ publishes for each species. The compatibility engine reads the same numbers; this is what they look like drawn on one axis.
Temperature (°C)
Scale: 0 to 36 °C.
No overlap. There is no temperature at which both species are inside their advised range.
pH (pH)
Scale: 4 to 9.5 pH.
Hardness (°dGH)
Scale: 0 to 30 °dGH.
Why the bands sit where they do
The overlap above is arithmetic. This is where the two numbers came from — the kind of water each animal is recorded from, and how much room that leaves.
These two animals come from different kinds of water, and that is where the arithmetic below comes from rather than from anything about their temperaments.
Goldfish
No wild referent
variable flow · not characteristic oxygen
Scissortail rasbora
Clearwater lowland river
20–100 µS/cm · moderate flow · near saturation oxygen
- TemperatureGoldfish 10–22°CScissortail rasbora 22–26°C
Both inside their range from 22–22°C — 0% of the narrower animal’s range.
Barely an overlap. Whatever is chosen, at least one animal spends its life at the limit of its published range — which is survivable and is not the same as suitable.
- pHGoldfish 7–8.5Scissortail rasbora 6–7.5
Both inside their range from 7–7.5 — 33% of the narrower animal’s range.
A real window, and a narrow one. The tank has to be held inside it, and there is little room for the drift that happens between water changes.
- General hardnessGoldfish 8–25 dGHScissortail rasbora 2–15 dGH
Both inside their range from 8–15 dGH — 54% of the narrower animal’s range.
A real window, and a narrow one. The tank has to be held inside it, and there is little room for the drift that happens between water changes.
Computed from the ranges AquariumHQ publishes for each species, each of which records what it rests on — a source value, a habitat inference, a physiological requirement or a trade convention. Most are habitat inferences, and the species pages say which.