Aquarium species with a confirmed native range
Species where a named checklist positively states the animal is native somewhere. This list is much shorter than it should be, and the reason is a property of the literature rather than of the animals.
What this page does not say
Absence from this page does not mean a species has no native range. It means no checklist AquariumHQ holds has coded one — and only five datasets in the entire harvest assert nativeness at all, against 137 that assert introduction.
126 species
Countries are as the source coded them. A species appears once, with every country any held checklist assigned to it under this status.
Where these statements come from
Every row above is a statement made by one of these checklists, retrieved through GBIF with the establishment means reproduced exactly as the source coded it.
- Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil
- Dyntaxa. Svensk taxonomisk databas
- Lista Roja Nacional de peces de agua dulce de Ecuador
- Lista Roja de la Fauna Venezolana 2015
- Listado taxonómico de peces y lampreas con distribución en México
- Peces del departamento de Caldas, Colombia
- RINSE - Registry of non-native species in the Two Seas region countries (Great Britain, France, Belgium and the Netherlands)
- South African National Species Checklist (Catalogue of Life in South Africa, COLSA)
- The Swedish Red List 2020
- Waarnemingen.be / observations.be - List of species observed in Belgium
- World Register of Marine Species
- 「全國水環境改善計畫」新竹市政府生態檢核暨相關工作計畫(112~113) | National Plan for Water Environments Improvement (2023-2024)
Where a checklist recorded presence without coding how the species got there, the record is held as unstated and does not appear on any of these pages. Filling that in would be the single most damaging thing AquariumHQ could do to this dataset.